Blog
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.
Tax Strategies for Scam Victims in 2023
Dealing with the tax implications of scams and theft losses can present intricate challenges, especially in light of evolving legislation that typically limits casualty and theft deductions to events linked with federally declared disasters. However, for those ensnared in scams, an essential tax strategy remains available through specific provisions of tax law.
Historically, taxpayers could claim theft losses not reimbursed by insurance. Although amendments to the tax code have narrowed these provisions, primarily restricting deductions to disaster-related losses, a significant exception persists. According to the tax code, if a scam occurs in a transaction with a profit intent, you may still qualify for a deduction.
Internal Revenue Code Section 165(c)(2) focuses on losses from profit-driven activities. This stipulates that financial losses tied to scams linked with pursuits for economic gain may allow you to deduct these losses, negating the necessity for a disaster declaration. Recognizing this niche exception can be pivotal, offering tax relief amidst losses incurred from deceptive scams.
Eligibility for Profit-Motivated Theft Losses: Several stringent criteria must be satisfied for a loss due to theft to qualify under profit-motivated exceptions:
- Profit Motive: The transaction must primarily aim for financial benefit. The IRS mandates evident proof of genuine profit expectation, substantiated by case law, IRS directives, and rigorous documentation supporting the profit intent.
- Transaction Type: Transactions eligible for deductions regularly involve traditional investment channels such as securities, real estate, or other income-producing ventures. Personal or social activities typically lack the necessary profit motive, hence disqualifying them from this deduction.
- Loss Nature: The loss must stem explicitly from a profit-driven transaction, easily verifiable through financial records and legal statements. Scenarios like investment scams or fraudulent schemes targeting investor finances often qualify under these standards.
IRS Interpretations: Applying these deductions often requires a thorough understanding of IRS guidelines and memoranda. For example, a recent IRS Chief Counsel Memorandum (CCM 202511015) provides clarity on admissible deductible losses:
- Investment Scams: Classic examples where losses, though deceptive in nature, are deductible if initially pursued with legitimate profit intentions. Validating transaction authenticity and profit motives through documentation like communications, investment contracts, and financial transfers are imperative.
- Theft Losses: Heavily scrutinized when profit-driven, requiring the loss to occur during a reimbursement-deserving, profit-bound transaction, not personal ventures like non-commercial loans.
Negative Tax Consequences: Falling prey to scams affecting your IRA or tax-deferred accounts can drastically impact your taxes, contingent on whether it is a traditional or Roth account.
Premature withdrawals from a traditional IRA or tax-deferred plan due to scams generally qualify as taxable income, escalating your total taxable earnings for the year, potentially leading to a higher tax bracket and increased liability. Additionally, if under 59½, these withdrawals may incur a 10% penalty for early withdrawal, intensifying financial pressure.
On the other hand, Roth IRA withdrawals offer less immediate tax consequences, as contributions are after-tax. Provided the account adheres to the five-year rule, withdrawals are tax- and penalty-free. However, early withdrawal of earnings, absent qualifying reasons, subjects them to taxes and penalties.
The following examples demonstrate when scam-related theft qualifies for casualty losses and the consequent tax effects. Generally, distant fund transfers resulting from scams conform to personal casualty loss qualifications, especially when recovery prospects are bleak.
Example 1: Impersonator Scam - Qualifying Loss
Victim 1, duped by a scam involving a "fraud specialist" impersonator, moved funds from IRA and investment accounts into alleged secure investment avenues, covertly controlled by the perpetrator siphoning assets overseas.
The crux of deductibility here rests on intention. Victim 1 sought to protect and reposition investments, underscoring a profit-oriented purpose. This makes scam losses deductible as thefts occurred in a financially motivated transaction.
Tax Implications:
a. Deductible loss for itemizers on Schedule A.
b. Taxation applies to traditional IRA distributions; recognize gains/losses on non-IRA assets. A 10% early withdrawal penalty applies if under 59½, without exemptions.
c. Funds rolled back into IRA within 60 days negate implications up to the rolled amount.
Example 2: Romance Scam - Non-Qualifying Loss
Victim 2, embroiled in a romance scam, was maneuvered to transfer funds into an offshore account following a false narrative of aiding a relative.
Herein, profit motive is absent. The transaction stemmed from personal emotion rather than financial intent, disqualifying losses under Section 165(c)(3), unless tied to federally declared disasters or personal casualty gains.
Tax Implications:
a. Non-deductible loss.
b. Taxation applies to traditional IRA distributions; impact on non-IRA finances remains significant, with a 10% early penalty without exceptions.
c. Rollbacks into IRAs within 60 days can alleviate implications.
Example 3: Kidnapping Scam - Non-Qualifying Loss
Victim 3, subject to a kidnapping imposter scam, released funds under duress from IRA and non-IRA accounts to an overseas account following impersonation.
Due to lack of investment intention, losses are ineligible for deduction, paralleling the stance of Example 2.
Concluding Insights: These case studies underscore the necessity of intent scrutiny and transactional context to determine scam-related deductible loss eligibility.
- Documentation and Intent: Maintaining intent documentation is crucial, particularly within investment contexts, to substantiate profit-motive claims.
- Vigilant Compliance: Heightened IRS scrutiny over non-disaster loss deductions mandates impeccable compliance, with auditors discerning qualifying versus non-qualifying claims.
Engage with our office when facing suspicious communications, especially before fund transfers, to obtain expert fraud detection and prevention advice. Educating family, especially seniors frequently targeted by scams, can mitigate risk and provide support to potential victims. A proactive approach ensures asset protection and reassurance.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.
We care about the protection of your data.
Our Offices
Our expertise is widespread and we have multiple office locations to make it convenient for you to get help. You can find us at:
Smart Tax Financial, LLC - Riverside, CA (Corporate)
Riverside, CA 92505
Phone: (909) 376-8770
FAX: (951) 479-9199
Smart Tax Financial, LLC - Ontario, CA
Ontario, CA 91761
Phone: (909) 376-8770
FAX: (951) 479-9199
Smart Tax Financial, LLC - San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino, CA 92408
Phone: (909) 376-8770
Fax: (951) 479-9199
Smart Tax Financial, LLC - Riverside, CA (Retail)
Riverside, CA 92505
Phone: (909) 376-8770
Fax: (951) 479-9199